5-0 to Theresa May
The Prime Minister plays a blinder
5-0 to Theresa May
It’s not just the England football team doing better than everyone expected this week. The Prime Minister’s Brexit white paper, as launched with Cabinet Ministers on Friday of last week, appears to have taken the red lines Theresa May spelled out in her Lancaster House speech last year, and smudged them entirely. But with it she has also scored quite a few goals over her opponents.
For many months, May has struggled to reconcile the various difficulties created by her affirmation that we would leave the Single Market and Customs Union. On top of this, she’s had to try and win over the completely unreconciled extremes of her party. The Prime Minister has however come down on the side of a soft Brexit. The UK will still be tied to a Customs Arrangement with the EU. It looks potentially messy, and will not be ready for some time, so the backstop that keeps the Northern Ireland problem at bay will be in operation for a good number of years to come. The Government will also try and convince the EU to allow the UK to cherry pick aspects of the Single Market for goods. But consensus is that it is possibly a workable solution. 1-0 to Theresa.
Beyond providing clarity on the Government’s negotiating proposals, the Prime Minister’s approach has also delivered another benefit for her; they have sorted the wheat from the chaff in Cabinet, with the not-contents having conveniently removed themselves from the decision-making process. This should make subsequent agreement between Ministers much easier – and quicker. The Ministerial resignations, especially that of Boris Johnson, may prove to be own goals, as they mean the Prime Minister no longer has the sword of Damocles hanging over her every decision, wondering whether they will storm out in rage over the retention of some links to the EU. By calling their bluff with her proposals, she can now look forward to more cohesive Cabinet government. 2-0 to Theresa.
This is not to say that there aren’t important Brexit voices left at the Cabinet table – Michael Gove perhaps the most important of those – but those remaining are either happy with the detail of the Government’s position, or realistic about what a clean, hard Brexit means for business and Northern Ireland.
So why did May finally come down on the side of soft Brexit? Firstly – as Boris Johnson and David Davis have proven – because she can afford to lose a few hardline Brexiteers if she can retain those who believe that any Brexit is a win. This will likely be reflected in the wider Parliamentary party too. Secondly, while there may be 48 Conservative MPs who want rid of Theresa May, she would almost certainly retain the leadership in a vote of no confidence, further weakening the hard Brexit Tories of the European Research Group (ERG). And finally, May has taken the soft Brexit option because this is the approach that has the support of the majority of the House of Commons, reflecting the tight result in the 2016 referendum. With the public largely having switched off from the detail, it’s not clear Leavers would feel betrayed by this form of Brexit, and it will likely appeal to Remainers as well. Perhaps the Prime Minister has succeeded in bringing the country together. 3-0 to Theresa.
In the end, the PM’s hard-nosed approach of locking her warring Ministers in a room and threatening them with taxis for one seems to have won out.
It took an age to get here, but it would appear the Government has arrived at a forced consensus, with a manageable number of casualties. Now all they have to do is convince the EU of their approach. Piece of cake.
What next for Britain’s Brexit?
Of course there’s no telling whether EU will reject this approach, but they’ve been noticeably quieter about the proposals than previous ones. In normal circumstances, the EU’s response has been that there will be no cherry picking, and that the four freedoms of the Single Market are indivisible.
There’s a chance negotiators on the other side of the Channel see May has given this her best shot.
They will also be concerned that, having seen May finally declare victory in the type of Brexit she wants to get through, a significant revision of those proposals by the EU would once again harden opinion in Parliament and lead to a situation in which the UK does go for a hard Brexit, or worse still (for the EU) see the Government collapse and risk the unknown of a Boris Johnson or Jeremy Corbyn administration. Neither are likely to provide the EU with a more appropriate arrangement post-Brexit than the one on offer from Theresa May.
And with the Chairman of the backbench 1922 Committee Graham Brady having confirmed that he does not yet have in his hand the 48 signatories required to trigger a vote of no-confidence, there’s a chance the Prime Minister has even called the bluff of the hardliners in the ERG. So, without having had to say it, Theresa May has had her ‘put up or shut up’ moment and come out the other side. 4-0 to Theresa.
That’s not to say there won’t be some malcontents who storm out of the Conservative Party, and there's been plenty of bluster from some Tory MPs since the publication. Nigel Farage has been making noises about coming back to frontline politics as leader of UKIP, and there may be a couple of Tory MPs who fancy a rerun of 2014 when two of their lot defected. However, there’s reason to believe it won’t result in a repeat of the Conservatives’ worries that they were about to be outflanked by UKIP. First, Brexit is happening, meaning a lot of people who might ordinarily have turned to UKIP will be satisfied. Secondly, it would appear that the Government still plan to curb freedom of movement, a core rallying call for UKIP. And lastly, the MPs who left the Conservative Party in 2014 did so in order to soften the UKIP message and make Brexit more palatable to the public. If the hardliners defect, there’s unlikely to be a repeat of that.
Theresa May hasn’t been so rash as to avoid balancing her Cabinet again, even if there have been some concerns that the Great Offices of State are all filled by Remainers.
Sajid Javid at the Home Office has always been lukewarm at best about the EU, new Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt has said he would now vote to leave, and the Prime Minister herself has been clear that her Government will deliver Brexit.
With the arrival at DExEU of Dominic Raab – an acolyte of Michael Gove and former Chief of Staff to David Davis – there remains a strong presence in the Cabinet for Leave, though of a different hue to that espoused by Boris Johnson and David Davis. As former Tory MP Douglas Carswell urged Leavers on Twitter: “take the win”; and this Cabinet’s Leavers appear ready to do just that. Rumours have swirled that there will be changes to the remit of DExEU, and it remains unlikely that the PM’s Brexit adviser Oliver Robbins will be stepping back from his role. Only time will tell whether Raab – put out by previous reshuffles that saw him left outside the Cabinet – proves to be useful in a post whose remit is about seeing through a Brexit that will happen in 8 months. Either way the reshuffle seems certain to solidify her place, with more power being given to her over the direction of Brexit.
So that’s 5-0 to Theresa in the course of one week. Brexit defined, a Government united, opposition curbed, a workable solution for the EU, and more control over the direction of her most important policy. The England football team could probably learn a thing or two from her.
Conservative Party vote of confidence procedure
If Graham Brady, Chair of the backbench 1922 Committee, receives the required 48 letters calling for Theresa May to go, he is required to start the process for a vote of confidence. While he has confirmed he is yet to receive that number, and Theresa May might well have sufficient support from MPs to remain in post, we set out below the due process the party would need to follow.
- Graham Brady, Chair of the 1922 Committee, receives 48 letters from Conservative MPs calling for a motion of confidence in the Prime Minister.
- When this number is exceeded he would call a confidence vote, perhaps as early as the next day. She needs a simple majority to win.
- If she wins she remains in place and cannot be challenged for another year.
- However if she loses she is excluded from standing in the leadership contest and an election for party leader begins.
- MPs seeking the leadership put their name forward and a number of voting rounds take place, with the MP with the fewest votes knocked out until only two remain.
- The two final candidates are put forward to a vote of the Conservative Party membership.
- This process takes around 3 months.
Director and Head of Public Affairs
Top seven things you need to know.....
About the Brexit White Paper
Top seven things you need to know about the Brexit White Paper
1. The Government proposes to establish a free trade area for goods
Ministers believe this will avoid the need for customs and regulatory checks at the border, remove the requirement for customs declarations, enable products to only undergo one set of approvals and authorisations in either market, and avoid the need for a hard border between Northern Ireland and Ireland.
2. The Government proposes a common rule book for goods including agri-food
In order to ensure this is possible, continued participation in agencies that provide authorisation for goods such as the European Aviation Safety Agency and the European Medicines Agency will be sought.
3. The Government proposes a phased introduction of a new facilitated customs arrangement
Ministers believe this will remove the need for customs checks and controls between the UK and the EU as if they were a combined customs territory. The UK would then control its own tariffs for trade with the rest of the world and ensure businesses paid the right or no tariff.
4. The free trade area would not cover services and digital
The UK and EU will not therefore have access to each other’s markets in these areas.
5. New arrangements will come into force covering financial services
These arrangements are aimed at reserving the mutual benefits of integrated markets and protecting financial stability while respecting the right of the UK and the EU to control access to their own markets. The arrangements are not expected to replicate the EU’s passporting regime.
6. A new framework will come into force covering UK and EU citizens’ rights to travel
The aim is for new arrangements to allow businesses and professionals to continue to provide services in each the UK and EU markets.
7. Continued cooperation is anticipated in other sectors
Partnerships are expected on areas including personal data and its free flow, fishing rights and access, accords on science and innovation, culture and education, defence and space.
Director and Head of Public Affairs
Lansons is offering a Brexit Planning Workshop
The vote two years ago presented
business with a new set of challenges
and opportunities, focused mainly on
the issues of freedom of movement of
goods and people to and from the UK
and EU, and jurisdictional uncertainties.
Business needs to understand the
regulatory hurdles it is likely to face
from the introduction of new barriers
between the UK and EU, interrogate its
own strengths and weaknesses, and be
ready to adapt accordingly.
Lansons is offering a half day business
planning workshop that offers expert
counsel against which businesses can test
their planning and engagement options.
This will be part presentation from
Lansons and part facilitation of
discussion with you. The workshop
will be tailored to your individual
specifications - included in the fee will
be a pre-workshop scoping session and
What is it?
A half-day strategic planning workshop-part presentation and part facilitation- as follows:
Our understanding of your issues and concerns
Where are we now?
1 hour 15 minutes
- The political situation
- The state of public and political opinion
- Likely outcomes from the negotiations
- Future dynamic between UK and EU
- UK and EU negotiating teams and their approach
Specific impacts on your business
- How will negotiation outcomes impact on your business?
- Opportunities and challenges
- Engaging with political and regulatory stakeholders
- Public messaging campaigns
- Internal communications
Summary of risks and opportunities
- Strategic recommendations
After the workshop, Lansons will submit a detailed report summarising the outcome and providing strategic recommendations for future action.
Sir John Grant, Former UK Ambassador to the EU
Sir John Grant is a former UK Ambassador to the
European Union (until 2007). He was Executive
Vice-President, Policy and Corporate Affairs,
BG Group plc, from 2009 - 2015. His position
as the Ambassador to the European Union has
provided him with a wealth of knowledge on the
inner workings of Brussels, the UK’s approach to
diplomatic negotiations, and the operations of the
relevant treaty provisions.
Ralph Jackson, Director and Partner, Lansons
email@example.com / +44(0)20 72943667
Ralph advises companies and organisations on
their corporate reputations. He is a public policy
specialist having worked and advised companies
on legislation, especially in financial services more
broadly, for over 25 years. Formerly the lead
spokesperson for the FSB, he has subsequently
advised life companies, asset managers, banks and
building societies on policy issues affecting them in
the UK and EU. This has included J.P. Morgan Asset
Management, Direct Line Group, Nationwide, Royal
London, Standard Life and HBOS.
James Endersby CEO, Opinium Research
One of the fastest growing insight agencies in the
UK, and one of only two to predict the actual
outcome of the referendum, Opinium is a leading
market research agency, with clients that span
multiple sectors and geographies. Whilst leading
a fast growing agency, James continues to work
closely with clients from a variety of sectors
including PwC, BAE, Direct Line and the London
School of Economics. James has a management
consulting background having previously worked
for the Monitor Group Management Consultants
(now Monitor Deloitte) and was based out of the
London, Delhi and Boston offices.
Richard Hobbs, Regulatory Consultant
Richard launched Beachcroft Regulatory
Consulting in 2002 following two years as an
independent consultant, during which time the FSA
was a major client. At the FSA, he worked mostly
on the project to reform polarisation. He was
previously a Civil Servant with the Department of
Trade and Industry. At the Association of British
Insurers he was Head of Life and Pensions for
three and a half years where he led the coordination
of the industry’s efforts to resolve the
pension’s miss-selling issue.
He has now returned to independent consulting
on most regulatory matters but specialises in
governance and all aspects of regulated firms’. He
is an expert on the European regulatory landscape,
with a deep understanding of the regulatory
interaction between UK and EU.
firstname.lastname@example.org/ +44(0)20 72943618
Michael has 13 years’ experience of politics and
public affairs and leads a team of experts with
backgrounds across Government, politics and
industry in helping clients to ensure favourable
regulatory frameworks. His focus is on providing
senior counsel to clients and the development and
execution of stakeholder engagement plans. Prior
to agency life, Michael led the public affairs offer
for EDF Energy’s existing nuclear fleet and nuclear
new build plans, and spent five years in politics
working for former British Energy Minister Charles
Hendry MP, where he supported the development
of the Conservative Party’s energy policy. He was
also a press officer for the Conservative Party
whilst in opposition.